tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post9177039335272683325..comments2024-01-15T09:37:29.174-08:00Comments on Las Vegas Cabbie Chronicles: L "The Ticket" Part VIIMrFunkMDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18037881254826751745noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-39481623858308753382010-11-24T03:46:39.421-08:002010-11-24T03:46:39.421-08:00So you think it's true? Yestarday I read enoth...So you think it's true? Yestarday I read enother things. I'll try to find that article.real estate agent softwarehttp://www.transactionmanagementsoftwareagent.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-83445186839586894282010-11-24T02:50:56.691-08:002010-11-24T02:50:56.691-08:00What a great post. I've enjoyed browsing throu...What a great post. I've enjoyed browsing through your site in the last couple days.transaction management softwarehttp://www.transaction-management-software.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-5912500926840906612010-11-24T02:15:50.028-08:002010-11-24T02:15:50.028-08:00WOW what an inspiration this post and site is to s...WOW what an inspiration this post and site is to so many like minded people out there who actually do have a heart.real estate transaction managementhttp://www.transactionmanagementrealestate.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-72210952600750562132010-10-29T03:05:56.564-07:002010-10-29T03:05:56.564-07:00What a great post. I've enjoyed browsing throu...What a great post. I've enjoyed browsing through your site in the last couple days.cash for gold rancho cucamunga cahttp://themoneystopgoldbuyers.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-5702811577184920842010-10-19T02:39:42.773-07:002010-10-19T02:39:42.773-07:00Every new special opinion, at its starting, is pre...Every new special opinion, at its starting, is precisely in a minority of one." But I am sure your thinking will have a great , because I like them very muchPainting Las Vegashttp://paintersoflasvegas.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-20571316923143644452010-10-18T17:28:27.901-07:002010-10-18T17:28:27.901-07:00"If you can't prove there was no traffic,..."If you can't prove there was no traffic, falsification doesn't even come into the equation. No proof, either side. Word vs. word."<br /><br />I dont have to prove anything. I don't bear the burden of proof, I only have to create doubt, which is what I was trying to do. And as has already been established, I acknowledged that mistake and apologized for it. This is an example of something that I learned during this process. <br /><br />"2) Saying how you WOULD be there with a notarized statement from your passenger... if he would have responded to your e-mail. Well, he didn't, so who cares. It just sounds (to the court) like you're grasping at straws on this one."<br /><br />Again something I learned. I agree with this 100%. If I could do again, I would omit this part. Fwiw, Bishop even told me that i was "coming from weakness" with this argument, but I left it in anyway. Again, let's not forget, I'm not a lawyer.<br /><br />And I NEVER admitted to loading at an intersection. I did say "pretty much" with regards to the questioning around the map, which somebody else pointed out is an admission of guilt, which I suppose, but I testified specifically that I "did not recall" my exact location. Furthermore, as has been established, that line of questions pertaining to the map should not have been admissible anywayMrFunkMDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18037881254826751745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-70417808738999618522010-09-02T08:49:05.741-07:002010-09-02T08:49:05.741-07:00I think you shot yourself in the foot a few times:...I think you shot yourself in the foot a few times:<br /><br />1) Talking about the cop being "malicious" and you hoping that the Court would take his falsification as "a very serious" offense. If you can't prove there was no traffic, falsification doesn't even come into the equation. No proof, either side. Word vs. word. And like you said, cop vs. cabbie. You know who they're going to go with. Act accordingly.<br /><br />2) Saying how you WOULD be there with a notarized statement from your passenger... if he would have responded to your e-mail. Well, he didn't, so who cares. It just sounds (to the court) like you're grasping at straws on this one.<br /><br />Finally, maybe I misread the actual original incident, but this is the first we heard of you actually stopping in an intersection (partially, sounds like). Law says you can't stop in the intersection. You did. You're guilty. Sucks, but it's true.<br /><br />If you would've stopped in the curb lane (not by a fire-hydrant, intersection, etc.) to pick up the passengers, then I think you would have had something. <br /><br />You were in the intersection? You are guilty as funk.<br /><br />All in all, very interesting read. Keep 'em comin'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-40737576030062771202010-08-31T02:07:17.476-07:002010-08-31T02:07:17.476-07:00One of the anonymous' said that "you lost...One of the anonymous' said that "you lost his/her sympathy when you accused the officer of malice and that the judge was then forced to rule in his favor unless she wanted to "indict" (that is I believe the word he/she used) him.<br /><br />I say that was NOT a mistake on your part. The officer was a lying sack of crap based on what you have said. I know you said you were in it to win it, so on that level then yes you were wrong but I think the even bigger principle is catching that officer in his lie.<br /><br />Anyway, I have read the subsequent next one chapter that is where you left off (I came to the site for only the second time today after finding it again after a long absence and read all the chapters up to the one directly after this that is the end so far) and must say I like so many others am anxiously awaiting the conclusion. Also, wishing you the best of luckCarmenThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12390664688417238867noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-31309096129941102122010-08-30T12:24:08.352-07:002010-08-30T12:24:08.352-07:00Wonderful read. Sorry it didn't work out. I ...Wonderful read. Sorry it didn't work out. I had a speeding ticket dismissed last year and this brought it all back. I was prepared to do everything you did but in the end the prosecutor lied to me outside the courtroom to get me to pay court costs in exchange for the dismissal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-62710483083216544502010-08-26T10:35:47.629-07:002010-08-26T10:35:47.629-07:00so, have you thought about being a lawyer? I think...so, have you thought about being a lawyer? I think you should.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-80178737569515179762010-08-26T06:14:46.981-07:002010-08-26T06:14:46.981-07:00Good going man! Don't be too hard on yourself....Good going man! Don't be too hard on yourself. You did good.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-23995905087190510312010-08-26T00:15:48.506-07:002010-08-26T00:15:48.506-07:00I'm not an "officer" of the court. B...I'm not an "officer" of the court. But you lost my sympathy when you began to accuse the TA cop of malice. The whole case then took on an "you versus us" tenor. You could question his memory, but you questioned his motive. The judge had no choice at that point, if she dismissed, she would be inditing the officer. A whole new can of worms. But spend more time in court, and you will figure out how the system works. The one with the most facts, documentation, witnesses,and precedence, wins. But , you were very close to dismissal in my opinion had you only questioned the officer's recollection of the violation. If you still feel not guilty, why not take the next step, and appeal the decision. The more resources they have to expend, the closer you are to a dismissal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-2318979269810797962010-08-25T08:58:07.757-07:002010-08-25T08:58:07.757-07:00A bummer you lost, but thank goodness someone is s...A bummer you lost, but thank goodness someone is sticking up for the principal of the situation!aburtchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09387990995340709326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-71794432625265703732010-08-25T07:57:01.365-07:002010-08-25T07:57:01.365-07:00damn. sorry The Man won - it's always frustrat...damn. sorry The Man won - it's always frustrating when you make your case as well as you could have possibly hoped to, and you still get stuffed.<br /><br />good job sticking up for your rights.Kid Dynamitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17475987512856310577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21486842.post-50063987933677703852010-08-25T05:20:56.748-07:002010-08-25T05:20:56.748-07:00judges "preside" over hearings, they don...judges "preside" over hearings, they dont "reside" over them.<br /><br />keep 'em coming!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com